NECESSITY AND CONTINGENCY IN REASONING.VAN DUYNE PC.1976; ACTA PSYCHOL.; PAYS-BAS; DA. 1976; VOL. 40; NO 2; PP. 85-101; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

THE DIFFICULTY OF USING DISJUNCTIVE HYPOTHESES.SCHOFIELD A.1976; J. GEN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 94; NO 2; PP. 223-232; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF REINFORCEMENT-PAIRED STIMULI ON GENERAL ACTIVITY.HYDE TS; TRAPOLD MA.1975; ANIMAL LEARNG BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 3; NO 4; PP. 282-286; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

RESPONSE SUPPRESSION IN RATS: A COMPARISON OF RESPONSE-CONTINGENT AND NONCONTINGENT PUNISHMENT AND THE EFFECT OF THE MINOR TRANQUILIZER, CHLORDIAZEPOXIDE. = SUPPRESSION DE LA REPONSE CHEZ LES RATS: UNE COMPARAISON DE LA CONTINGENCE DE LA REPONSE DE LA PUNITION NON-CONTINGENT ET DE L'EFFET D'UN TRANQUILLISANT MINEUR, LE CHLORDIAZEPOXYDEHUPPERT FA; IVERSEN SD.1975; PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGIA; ALLEM.; DA. 1975; VOL. 44; NO 1; PP. 67-75; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

A TEMPORAL PARAMETER INFLUENCING CHOICE BETWEEN SIGNALLED AND UNSIGNALLED SHOCK SCHEDULES.HARSH J; BADIA P.1976; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 25; NO 3; PP. 327-333; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

FAILURE TO LEARN TO ESCAPE BY RATS PREVIOUSLY EXPOSED TO INESCAPABLE SHOCKS IS IN PARTLY PRODUCED BY ASSOCIATIVE INTERFERENCE = L'ECHEC A APPRENDRE UN ECHAPPEMENT CHEZ DES RATS PREALABLEMENT EXPOSES A DES CHOCS INELUCTABLES EST PRODUIT EN PARTIE PAR UNE INTERFERENCE ASSOCIATIVEMAIER SF; TESTA TJ.1975; J. COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 88; NO 2; PP. 554-564; BIBL. 15REFArticle

LES EFFETS DE LA CONSCIENCE DES ETAPES DE L'APPRENTISSAGE SUR LES GAINS DE PERFORMANCE DANS LE CONDITIONNEMENT DE CONCEPT-ANALYSE DES PROCESSUS DE REPONSEYOSHIDA H.1975; JAP. J. PSYCHOL.; JAP.; DA. 1975; VOL. 46; NO 2; PP. 100-108; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

AUTOCONTINGENCIES: A MODEL FOR SUBTLE BEHAVIORAL CONTROL.DAVIS H; MEMMOTT J; HURWITZ MB et al.1975; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., GEN.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 104; NO 3; PP. 169-188; BIBL. 2 P.Article

AVOIDANCE CONDITIONING WITH SHOCK CONTINGENT UPON THE AVOIDANCE RESPONSE = LE CONDITIONNEMENT INSTRUMENTAL D'EVITEMENT AVEC CONTINGENCE DU CHOC SUR LA REPONSE D'EVITEMENTLAMBERT JV; BERSH PJ; HINELINE PN et al.1973; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 19; NO 2; PP. 361-367; BIBL. 10REF.Article

CONDITIONING WITHOUT AWARENESS-AGAINBRANDEIS R; LUBOW RE.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 5; NO 1; PP. 36-38; BIBL. 14REF.Article

EINFLUESSE VON WILLKUERLICHKEIT, PROVOKATION UND ERREGUNG AUF AGGRESSIVES VERHALTEN = INFLUENCE DE L'ARBITRAIRE, DE LA PROVOCATION ET DE L'EXCITATION SUR LES CONDUITES AGRESSIVESBORNEWASSER M; MUMMENDEY A.1981; Z. EXP. ANGEW. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0044-2712; DEU; DA. 1981; VOL. 28; NO 3; PP. 374-392; ABS. FRE/ENG; BIBL. 2 P.Article

A NOTE ON MEASUREMENT OF CONTINGENCY BETWEEN TWO BINARY VARIABLES IN JUDGMENT TASKSALLAN LG.1980; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 15; NO 3; PP. 147-149; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

FREE CHOICE OF SIGNALED VS. UNSIGNALED SCRAMBLED ELECTRIC SHOCK WITH RATS.CRABTREE MS; KRUGER BM.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 6; NO 4A; PP. 352-354; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

SUPPRESSIVE AND ENHANCING EFFECTS OF FOOTSHOCK ON FOOD-REINFORCED OPERANT RESPONDING FOLLOWING SEPTAL LESIONS IN RATS = EFFETS SUPPRESSIFS ET ACCROISSANTS DU CHOC AU PIED SUR LA REPONSE OPERANTE RENFORCEE PAR LA NOURRITURE APRES LESIONS SEPTALES CHEZ LE RATDICKINSON A.1975; J. COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 88; NO 2; PP. 851-861; BIBL. 1PArticle

LEARNED HELPLESSNESS AND THE DETECTION OF CONTINGENCY: A DIRECT TESTTENNEN H; DRUM PE; GILLEN R et al.1982; JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY; ISSN 0022-3506; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 50; NO 4; PP. 426-442; BIBL. 2 P.Article

NONCONTINENT SUCCESS VERSUS NONCONTINGENT FAILURE AND LEARNED HELPLESSNESSTIGGEMANN M.1981; J. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3980; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 109; NO 2; PP. 233-238; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

BILATERAL DIFFERENCES IN PARIETAL-OCCIPITAL EEG INDUCED BY CONTINGENT VISUAL FEEDBACK.EBERLIN P; MULHOLLAND T.1976; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 13; NO 3; PP. 212-218; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

CONTINGENCY THEORY AND CLASSICAL AUTONOMIC EXCITATORY AND INHIBITORY CONDITIONING. SOME PROBLEMS OF ASSESSMENT AND INTERPRETATIONFUREDY JJ; POULOS CX; SCHIFFMANN K et al.1975; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 12; NO 1; PP. 98-105; BIBL. 1P.Article

SHOCK-INDUCED SUPPRESSION AND POTENTIATION OF INSTRUMENTAL RESPONDING BY RATS = SUPPRESSION INDUITE PAR UN CHOC ET POTENTIALISATION DE LA REPONSE INSTRUMENTALE CHEZ LE RATMYER JS.1975; J. COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 88; NO 2; PP. 580-585; BIBL. 21REFArticle

INFERENCES BASED ON UNCERTAIN DATA: SOME EXPERIMENTS ON THE ROLE OF SLOPE MAGNITUDE, INSTRUCTIONS, AND STIMULUS DISTRIBUTION SHAPE ON THE LEARNING OF CONTINGENCY RELATIONSHIPSNAYLOR JC; DOMINE RK.1981; ORGAN. BEHAV. HUM. PERFORM.; ISSN 0030-5073; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 27; NO 1; PP. 1-31; BIBL. 2 P.Article

RECOGNITION OF NONCONTINGENCYPETERSON C.1980; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 38; NO 5; PP. 727-734; BIBL. 2 P.Article

A REEVALUATION OF ANGLE-CONTINGENT COLOR AFTEREFFECTSHAYMAN CAG; ALLAN LG.1980; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 28; NO 1; PP. 61-67; BIBL. 30 REF.Article

FIRST INTERVAL SKIN CONDUCTANCE RESPONSES. CONDITIONED OR ORIENTING RESPONSES.PROKASY WF.1977; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 14; NO 4; PP. 360-367; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

SELECTING A RANDOM SAMPLE OF QUESTIONS IN A CONTINGENCY MANAGED (PSI) COURSE.MARTIN RF.1977; PSYCHOL. REC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 27; NO 1; PP. 349-350; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

SIMPLE AND CONTINGENT AFTEREFFECTS OF PERCEIVED DURATION IN VISION AND AUDITIONWALKER JT; IRION AL; GORDON DG et al.1981; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 29; NO 5; PP. 475-486; BIBL. 32 REF.Article